Archive for the 'Personal' Category

26
Jul
09

that’s why all the folks on rocky top get their corn fom a jar

DSC_3838

It was another bittersweet day. More than anything, I regret the things I said and did when Brian and I argued at the end of our trip. With Andrew and Chad’s help, I had trimmed the argument scene from the play down to a much faster, much angrier, and much more accurate portrayal of that fight. That Nick and Thomas (and Jen and Jenna) played their roles so splendidly made it that much harder to watch and listen to…take after take.

Then again, they turned in great performances today and we wrapped the shoot on time and on budget (I think).

After we left the set, in ones and twos a few of the crew gathered at Chad and Jen’s place. We drank the better part of a quart of moonshine and encouraged Emily to tell us more stories from Breathitt County. I was writing them down when Andrew, feeling the corn liquor, narrowed his eyes a little and drawled across the table, “Boy, when we’re talkin’ around the shine WE don’t take notes.”

As eager as I am to see Tab and the girls tonight, it was hard to leave this morning. Jen has been so gracious and generous while I’ve been squatting in Dylan’s room for the past two weeks. And Andrew has become like a brother to me–not just because he FELT this story so strongly, but because I could sit and talk with him for hours.

And especially because Chad and I, who have always shared a loss, have spent the last two weeks handling it again. And because all of us, working together, brought something of them back.

24
Jul
09

Night for Day

DSC_3623
Today…

Chad and Andrew and Tommy loaded a camera worth more than all of my possessions into a flat-bottomed boat today so they could shoot and shoot and shoot from the water. John and Angela and Ian stood in the water to hold the boats steady and in position.

It was, finally, sunny. Brilliant. Perfect for shooting “day-for-night” with filters and low angles.

At lunch, Emily told the story of one of her mother’s elderly patients who, on her very first visit to a hospital, complained to Emily’s mother about the food in her hospital room. “There’s something wrong with that Kentucky jelly. I tried some on a biscuit and it just tasted terrible.”

The news crew canceled out of consideration for the scenes we were shooting today.

One of the interns, a great guy named Kenny, took my camera out in the canoe so I could have a shot of the four cast members out on the dock (in the “wish” scene). I was asked to back his car out of the way of the shot. I told him that if he didn’t get my camera in the lake I wouldn’t put his car in the lake.

All four of the actors nailed that scene.

Nick (as “Scott”) howled as he threw the typewriter out into the lake. Angela and John retrieved it from the water. He threw it again and again.

Jen (”Tab”) told me that she once owned a dog that would never come when it was called. Her mother named it “Godot.”

Nick had to change clothes for the scene in which he is finally revealed to also be the “narrator”. We stood on the dock and talked about his lines. He was covered in mud and I poured lake water on his head and down his back. When we were alone, he asked me what the lines meant, what I really wanted out of my brother. I told him.

Andrew called action and I poured another bowl of lake water on his head and leapt out of the shot. Nick shouted “Swim, Goddammit! Swim!.” He screamed it out over the lake. He wept and howled and screamed it again and again and again.

When that was over, Chad and Andrew took a break as DP and Director and came over to sit in the beached canoe with me. You would have thought none of us already knew how this ends.

Also, Jen and I watched a finch landing on a cat tail at the lake’s edge. It plucked a wisp from the ragged end and flew off to pad its nest. It kept coming back for more.

24
Jul
09

Day for Night

DSC_3568
After a beautiful day shooting the hiking scenes at the pinnacles yesterday, today they shoot the lake scenes. The accident (they won’t actually show it) is the first series of shots of the day. They are shooting “day for night” which means they darken it in post-production. Catchy phrase.

I’m uploading photos while they shoot those first several shots, then I’ll head back to watch the dock scenes (in which “Scott” throws the typewriter off the dock, and the fantasy scene in which the four are reunited on the dock). At some point this morning, a TV news crew is coming. That will be weird. After the newspaper story last week, I’m a bit nervous about talking to a television reporter. I don’t want to misspeak again.

22
Jul
09

Echo chamber

Yesterday, I spent most of the day in the recording room with Nick and Andrew, and the “location sound” guy, Brendan. Nick was recording the voice-over parts (mostly the narrator’s lines) and I was along to assist as best I could.

First, let me just say how strange and gratifying it is to listen to someone read the words you wrote. Since some of the stuff Nick laid down was poetry, that was especially thrilling.

Second, let me say how hard it is to read poetry out loud. I’ve been doing it for as long as I can remember–and I think I’m pretty good at it. I can even read other people’s poems out loud pretty effectively (I love reading Liz’s poem “Inshallah”). But even actors struggle to read it with emphasis, shifts in tempo, caesura… Nick did a great job, but it must have been frustrating to him to have Andrew and me stopping him all the time.

And that brings me to my third point. I can’t say enough about Andrew’s direction on this film. He knows every word of this script. If you poured all of them onto the floor, he could put it back together again. He’s also climbed in and explored the cavities and spaces between the words. He understands not just what each line means. But what it also means. And also means. And also means….

What a privilege it is, as a writer, to have someone who fully inhabits your work.

21
Jul
09

Herons, Typewriters, wishes

I lay in bed for a long time tonight/this morning thinking about that last post. That question still dogging me.

Thursday or Friday we’ll be shooting the lake scenes. Obviously, one is the accident.

The others are fantasies.

I forget now what the various stages of grief are supposed to be. One, I’m sure, is the blind acceptance of pop psychology. Another is anger. The kind of anger that makes you rave against the dead. Or hurt the living. Or throw typewriters off a dock…as we will do later this week. This scene is daydream rage. Rage against Brian, against Wendy, against God, against lakes and water and mud and night. Here’s a poem that is daydream rage too (but read on after the poem, also):

Heron

1
In tangled hemp and scrub oak, I watch a heron
fall from a branch into a heavy glide
over the Missouri. By now, I know how a frog
or a sunfish freezes him in mid-stride
and I can guess which silence
turns his head, which ripple
will bring him sailing to the shallows.
Stillness isn’t camouflage: to break a heron’s back
requires careful, random movement; step when branches
scrape the levee, when the river shifts
a stone.

2
My brother’s laughter flew from stream
to leaves when the wind lifted the dry flies
from my box into the water. One leafless branch
opened ragged wings and fled downstream.
Brian stopped laughing long enough to watch
it disappear. I searched for my lost lures,
recounting a friend’s haiku: Heron following
river following heron…
Brian whipped his rod, back and forth, settled
the fly onto the surface. He said herons
scared the hell out of him. Madness.

3
The plan won’t work–the heron feels me
watching. When branches click, I plant
a toe; when a carp’s back rolls on the surface,
a heel. I stop thinking and become a tributary
winding down between the bluffs. A heron’s vision
is nearly 200 degrees. It meets your gaze
from almost any angle. When my foot meets water,
the heron’s eyes shoot wide; stumbling into flight,
he stretches out his neck, leaps into the air.
I throw sand, a broken clamshell,
and kick the waves.

4
Who’s stupid enough, in rain and fog, to load a boat
with beer and friends and row until night
takes the shore? Factor in one affair
for each couple, one betrayal apiece.
Factor in two married mothers, two bachelors.
They huddle together in an unseasonably cold 53 degrees
and surely someone suggests they pull anchor,
pull oars, pull the hell out of here.
Factor in two who can swim, two who can’t.
My brother exhales smoke into fog, lays
a hand on the oar and laughs.

5
Head drawn between its shoulders, one leg
hovering slightly forward, my heron studies
the current. For three days, concealed, dreaming
of nets spread in the overhang, wire snares
weighted in the shallows, I’ve watched
his shadow unfold in the river. Lately,
I imagine similarities in the accurate gravity
of beak and fist. When he strikes,
his body pours it’s long neck and face
into the river: Ciconiiformus Ardea
Herodias.

6
Kicking the boat and the dock they couldn’t
reach, shouting and weeping for Brian’s lost
eyeglasses, which were presumed hidden
in the lake, I prayed.
Great God,
you vicious son of a bitch, tell me
one thing you love, and I’ll destroy it,
and be done.
Somewhere in a clear darkness,
coursing up the long rigid trachea,
shuddering out the beak, a heron’s cry
rolls across the water.

7
Assuming the attitude of the dead, I float:
breathing when the river breathes, pushing
away from snarls and the levee until at last,
above me, the heron glances away
from a corpse. I catch the base of his throat,
and rising–both of us–out of the water,
I snap him hard, right and left,
his sharp feet clawing my thighs and belly
until with both hands, and all my weight,
I hold him under. Choking, convulsing,
his wings beat uselessly on the current.

We’ll be filming another fantasy, too. When we met in New York to work on the script, I made the first of several important friendships that have come of this project. As we worked on the final pages of the script, Andrew asked me what I would have wished for Brian and Wendy and all of us. I’ve been in a state of rage and loss for so many years that I had rarely considered such a question.

We’re going to film the four of them, alive, on that dock, on that lake, laughing and having fun. Uncorrupted. Clean. In love with each other.

I don’t know what I expected or wanted from this film when I wrote the first drafts. But Andrew helped me unearth something in the story that I had never seen in it before. Instead of chasing them into the void with anger and pain and guilt and loss, I get to send a wish after them–a snapshot they would have loved.

20
Jul
09

ring the bell

I spoke to Roger on the phone tonight for the first time in several weeks. I haven’t mentioned Roger by name in a single posting. Not on this blog. Not on the Rocky Top blog.

Roger was Wendy’s husband. He was, and is, one of the closest friends I’ve ever had. I proposed to Tab on their couch. I called him at 2 am on several occasions to read him bad poems. I held their son, Jhett, when he was the size of a loaf of bread. Even before I lost one brother, I had found another. After the accident, we called each other across the country and around the world to howl our agony.

We talked about this film–really talked about it–for the first time ever. That conversation is between us. However, it made me keenly aware that my family and friends–especially those whose lives were changed by Brian and Wendy’s deaths–are watching the whole thing unfold again.

Later, as I watched TV with Chad and Jen, I was asking myself why I’m doing this. Why am I putting Tab and Roger and our kids and siblings and parents and friends through this? What is there to learn? What is there to gain?

I don’t know. I can only say that sixteen years ago a hammer struck and I am a bell that’s been ringing ever since. I don’t know how not to.

20
Jul
09

Blue cars

DSC_3238

Funny the things that catch me. Last night we filmed a scene at a roadside grocery store. In the scene, we have stopped for supplies. Tab is sitting in the open door of the passenger seat, stretching her legs and back. Wendy and I are on the trunk of the car passing a joint and being silly. Brian walks out and tosses us a bag of chips.

It’s just a brief scene illustrating the tension between us: my neglectfulness of Tab, Brian’s growing feelings for Wendy, Wendy’s growing flirtatiousness, Tab’s isolation, the beginnings of the jealousy, resentment, and recrimination into which the trip eventually devolved.

I suppose that was why it was hard to watch. This scene begins to establish my culpability. This scene represents one of the last places where I could have changed course.

And then there is the car. It’s no 1976 Mercury Marquis, but it is very nearly as big and square as the real one. And it is adorned with the actual artifacts of the trip. Brian’s bag and pullover. The bone necklace Hans made me. The tassel from my college graduation (I graduated college the day before we left). It’s the movie’s perfectly cast fifth character. It’s the scene of the crime. It’s a broken time machine.

I drove it home from the shoot last night while Chad and Andrew returned the equipment van to the EKU campus. I was glad to have the time alone. It’s a smooth ride, but it drifts away if you don’t hold the wheel.DSCN2140

17
Jul
09

The Plank

I had a dream about a year ago in which Brian was alive and we were (in parts of the dream) kids. We were playing in the driveway at one point and I accidentally knocked him over. He stopped speaking and began to lose his shape. I dragged him by the feet into a sort of wooden shed that was suddenly, conveniently, nearby. I took an old plane and began to run it up his torso toward what should have been a face. By the time I got there, he was a wooden plank.

There was one part of the newspaper story yesterday that bothered me more than any other: “I’m a writer, a poet and I wrote it out of myself years ago,” he said. “I’ve written this thing so many times it’s almost not my story. It now lives on paper.”

I was misquoted, but only slightly. I mostly said what she wrote. I wish I hadn’t, though.

I was thinking about that as I was trying to fall asleep last night. We need a journal for the waterfall scene and I had volunteered to use Brian’s actual journal from the trip. Chad and Andrew didn’t like that idea for obvious reasons so this morning I’ll walk over to the college bookstore and find something else.

I lay awake for a long time last night thinking about the ways I am shaving him down.

03
Jun
08

Email burnout — or Length Matters in Love Letters — or sab-BAD-ical attitude #1 — or confronting the reverse transmission-composition proportionality paradigm

This is how my friend Ruby reacted when I did not reply to her email within 24 hours:

may_2008_umbagog-056_ruby-and-duck-egg.JPG

I sometimes get the same vibe from my students, colleagues, and family. Since an email “arrives” nearly instantaneously, I think we have come to expect a response in minutes or hours rather than days. If we don’t get an email response from someone in that amount of time we assume that either their computer is broken or they have had a stroke. If another day passes, they clearly hate us / disrespect us / are incompetent.

When I was fourteen, I had my first and only girlfriend-via-correspondence. Her name was Rena and we met at a matinee showing of “Ghostbusters.” My family didn’t have air conditioning, so I used my allowance and haying money as often as I could to go to the movies in the hottest part of the day. I was a film buff, I guess. Anyway, Rena and I made eye contact during the opening credits while I was slurping my coke and in an uncharacteristic act of bravery I leaned over the two rows of seats 20 minutes into the movie and asked for her phone number. Or I got my brother to do it, I’m not sure. Turns out she lived in Grant City, MO. When you’re from Agency, MO, (population 900, but just five miles from St. Joe) there aren’t many places you can describe as even more of a hick town than your own. So I guess she was attracted to my urbane sophistication. Since our love was star-crossed by 105 miles of rolling missoura prairie, and since neither of our parents’ would allow us unfettered access to the long-distance phone lines, we had no choice but to correspond through the US postal service.

Imagine this: while the windows steam up from the humidity outside, you labor all morning over your 16th letter in five weeks, carefully sculpting an image of yourself, “I’ve been lifting wates and practicing with my marshal arts a lot. That’s not flowers on the back of this paper. I traced my 2 favorite throwing stars. They’re called shurikens. I’ve got 4 of them. I’ll probly get some more this summer.” Since she doesn’t know any of your friends, you pretty much portray yourself as a sort of teen-aged Territorial Governor–a leader in your community, respected for your fairness, wit, and fearsome roundhouse kicks (oh yeah, I was Napoleon Dynamite..and so was EVERY one of my friends). And since your devotion is best calculated in page count, rather than action or clear sentiment, you can ramble on for pages about your parents, your friend’s dad’s truck that you “rutinely” drive in the pasture, your favorite shows, your hunting conquests, your complete collection of the Conan, Tarzan, and The Horseclans book series’. And since you’re also sensitive, you can confide that you still almost cry when they play the Ghostbusters theme song on the radio every 10 minutes. Then you tell her about all of the money you’ve saved from haying and urge her to arrange a visit to her cousin in St. Joe in a few weeks… all the while DYING to reveal to her that you bought her what just may be a gold bracelet at Montgomery Wards for $20.

At 12:15, you put on a $.19 stamp and stumble out into the heat, put the letter in the mailbox and flip up the red metal flag. At 12:35 the mail-lady pulls up in her station wagon and takes your letter, leaving a wad of mail behind. There’s one from her (in response to your 14th letter)! You leave the rest of the mail in the mailbox and tear into her envelope before you even get to the door. She doesn’t waste much time: “Scott, I think we have to be just friends, Scott. I’ve been really confuse because I [heart] you soooooo much but I also love the other Scott too [here, she was referring to her ex-...well, suddenly CURRENT (again) boyfriend with the same name] and he’s here and he knows all of my frens. He has a lisense too…”

You see what I’m getting at? If she had waited two days to send that letter–and to make up her mind between that hillbilly Scott and this cultured Scott–she would have seen that I had THROWING STARS and SAVINGS (i.e. I could protect and provide) and BOOKS (i.e. I was going to be an English Professor someday and earn big and the respect and adulation of my community). I’m not bitter all these years later. I’ll bet she is, though.

Has email made us more patient? Has it made us consider what is worthwhile to communicate? Duh. As frenzied and ridiculous as my correspondence with Rena was, is it really sillier than the many times YOU have sent out a brilliant email then put off all meaningful work to hit the Send/Receive button every 15 seconds for an entire afternoon waiting for replies? What about the times you’ve labored over an indignant response to a colleague’s email–pointing out the unprofessional tone, the errors, the miscalculations–only to hit send and see in the meantime that they had already sent out a heartfelt apology and explained that their wife’s heart attack that morning had left them “out of sorts”?

But none of this gets at the real reason I started writing this post. My students understand email better than my colleagues and my family and myself. They realize that there is now (and always has been) a transmission-composition proportionality paradigm. Simply explained, they spend time writing an email or letter in proportion to the time it will take for it to travel from them to its recipient. It took two days for my letters to get to Rena. I spent hours on each letter. They were always several pages. It takes 3.52 seconds for my email to reach someone on the other side of the planet. Therefore, I should spend no more than 2 seconds composing it. Less if I’m replying to something whiny.

Instead, we professionals too often succumb to the reverse transmission-composition proportionality paradigm which posits that all of the time our correspondents save in waiting for the postal service should now be spent composing a three paragraph response to our query about borrowing their scotch tape.

I’m therefore compiling a list of my future email responses (with an ear for tone, as demonstrated by the carefully placed exclamation points) starting with some of the standard responses in a magic 8-ball. Feel free to suggest additions:

  • Ask again later
  • As I see it, yes
  • Better not tell you now
  • Concentrate and ask again
  • Don’t count on it
  • It is decidedly so
  • Most likely
  • My sources say no
  • Outlook good
  • Outlook not so good
  • Reply hazy, try again
  • Signs point to yes
  • My bad.
  • I’ll get right on that, honey.
  • Ha!
  • Here ya go!
  • thin mints, 4 boxes
  • I’ll get right on that, Liz.
  • Sorry about that :-)
  • No, thank you.
  • Okee-dokee.
  • I’ll get right on that, President Steen.
  • Is this student-centered?
  • LOL!!!
  • whatever
  • Why yes, I DO have some expertise with shuriken.


20
Mar
08

Cranes & Flamingos

I’ve mentioned Christine Messina’s fantastic blog, Finding the Qs, on here before. She let me in on the action by sending two of her origami peace cranes with me to Orlando, Florida, for the Redesign Alliance Conference. I loved the cranes–especially this beautiful black one with silver lettering–but I REALLY enjoyed leaving them inserting them in strategic spots for some lucky traveler to find.

Click here to read the details.

orange1.JPG

black1.JPG